Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versatile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. John Reaves (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Versatile
This page currently has two articles: one is a dictionary definition of the work Versatile (Wikipedia is not a dictionary) and the other is for a tractor brand with no notability established. - BierHerr 15:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Note I boldly removed the dicdef. No opinion on the corporation. YechielMan 02:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Top and bottom in sex and BDSM. The tractor company does not appear to be notable. Otto4711 01:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Quick scan of ghits suggests it's a notable brand name. Dppowell 03:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- redirect to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis. That solution would solve the problem. 149.89.1.32 17:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- If by "solve the problem" you mean "create a nonsensical redirect", then yes. But no. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not strike the comments of other editors, even if you consider them "bad" or ill-advised. The closing admin will judge the merits of the arguments and will act accordingly. I have reverted your action. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 07:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, fair enough I guess. It just struck me as an entirely bad-faith vote intended only to confuse the situation. Zetawoof(ζ) 08:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- And you're probably right ... it's just disruption (check the IP's other recent edits). Since the suggestion makes no sense, it will just be ignored (as numbers are not the most important thing in an AfD). -- Black Falcon (Talk) 06:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, fair enough I guess. It just struck me as an entirely bad-faith vote intended only to confuse the situation. Zetawoof(ζ) 08:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not strike the comments of other editors, even if you consider them "bad" or ill-advised. The closing admin will judge the merits of the arguments and will act accordingly. I have reverted your action. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 07:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- If by "solve the problem" you mean "create a nonsensical redirect", then yes. But no. Zetawoof(ζ) 23:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No complaint against the tractor brand, but I think it would be strange if people searching versatile on wikipedia ended up reading about a tractor. Eusebeus 06:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
