Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernallagra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 23:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vernallagra

Vernallagra (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

It is a neologism and basically a copy of an article on another subject, complete with misleading pseudo-references, now deleted. Merenta (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. I don't think this article belongs in English wikipedia at all, there are already two pages on MDMA, the other only discussing the effects of the drug on the body. I don't think this page should be merged with MDMA either as it doesn't contain any unique information, other than the nickname of the substance. This page may very well belong in another wiki in some asian language, but I can't see any reason for it to exist otherwise.

Kst447 (talk) 23:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep I'm not entirely familiar with guidelines for medicines/drugs but this is not a neologism. --neonwhite user page talk 23:19, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. One unverifiable reference. The sidebar links point either to entries for MDMA itself or go nowhere. No Google Scholar or Google Books or Google News Archive results for "vernallagra" (one hit does lead back to an old Wikipedia mirror). Given a culture where street drugs often trip alarmism wires long before they are actually in wide use this just doesn't seem like a notable drug, even assuming that the article is correct that it is a variant of Ecstasy. --Dhartung | Talk 03:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

--Dhartung | Talk 03:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per Dhartung.  Atyndall93 | talk  10:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. I have never heard of this term for MDMA. Even if it really is a term for a preparation containing MDMA, it is incorrect to say that this preparation is in clinical trials or has effects that are actually due to the active ingredient (MDMA). And the reference at the end is actually to an article about MDMA ((http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/mdma/mdma_article3.shtml). This suggests the entry is malevolent and deceptive in intent. The article should definitely be deleted.

--69.3.233.44 (talk) 06:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.