Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermontcentric

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vermontcentric

Vermontcentric (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced, apparently pointless article. "Something-centric" means a narrow focus on "something". There is no reason to pick out Vermont for its own article. NawlinWiki 14:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. In the interests of openness and disclosure, I had originally prodded this article for the reason given in the nomination. Marwood 16:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Per nom. Why not Michigancentric, or Californiacentric? The article in the See also section covers everything. •Malinaccier• T/C 18:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, notability, and WP:NEO. "The Great State of Vermont will not apologize for its cheese!" Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 19:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. DCEdwards1966 19:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't want to come across as nitpickcentric, but the nonsensecentricity of this article makes me want to perform an asscentric kick on its author. --Targeman 20:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Deletecentric per everyone above. Almost as useless as C-town Mandsford 22:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, exapand, spread globally Vermont will not be mocked. CApitol3 19:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
  • If unchecked, the exapansion could cover the free world behind a Maple Syrup Curtain.
  • Weak delete, if anything, we could post the details to Vermont if this term is commonly accepted. VoltronForce 00:11, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge? with the article Creeping Global Vermontism ? CApitol3 22:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.