Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veoh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-22 10:25Z

[edit] Veoh

Veoh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has been speedied a few times, personally, I'm unsure about this. Hence, I'm bringing it to AfD, to get a firm consensus on this. Yanksox 20:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Should the article be unprotected now that is has been restored? --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. As the article states, the company has recieved a large amount of media attention ever since Michael Eisner, former Disney CEO, began investing into the company. (ie New York Times, Business Week)--TBCΦtalk? 20:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep just about notable because of Eisner, otherwise just another webhost. Totnesmartin 16:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Obvious Keep, a simple Google search will show that this AFD is trolling. Also have a look at the Alexa ranking. Beats me. frummer 19:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep I can't see any reason why this article should be disallowed, provided that it is written properly (and not like an advert, for example), and the current article seems to not break any wikipedia rules.Mlscdi 19:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Other admins have speedily deleted this article. I restored it because I'm such a nice guy, and then I brought it to AfD so we can finally get consensus to close the chapter on this. Yanksox 21:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.