Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varèse Sarabande
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nominator withdrawal. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy5 (talk) 20:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Varèse Sarabande
At best, a weak claim to satisfying WP:CORP (several passing mentions, very few concrete sources), blatantly promotional, and completely unreferenced. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 02:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep this one. Easily fits the "heard of it well before reading a Wikipedia article on it" test. In fact, this label figures fairly prominently in my CD collection, seeing as they released the soundtracks for The 13th Warrior, all of the Xena: Warrior Princess soundtrack albums, Phantasm, and many more. Amazon.com confirms, and returns 2,830 hits on the string "Varèse Sarabande". This would appear to be a notable record label, and as such needs improvement (and perhaps stubbing) but not deletion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - very notable label that's been around for years. This looks like a case of WP:OSTRICH to me. 23skidoo (talk) 16:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll believe you, and withdraw the nomination, but I'm fairly sure actual evidence (secondary reliable sources) should be provided first to provide someone else as ignorant as I am about the subject won't renominate based on the fact that no evidence for notability was provided last time. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 19:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Easily the most-notable soundtrack and film score label of all, with a long history and tons of notable releases. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sigh - could you please read my message above instead of piling on? Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 19:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

