Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VandalProof

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete as self-referential (and a cross-namespace redirect in all but name). Just zis Guy you know? 15:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VandalProof

Disambiguation page with only one entry. This was deleted twice when it was a redirect from main space to userspace. I consider this as an opportunity to discuss whether such a redirect (in a form or another) should stay, once and for all. - Liberatore(T) 11:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete this is just a blatant attempt to circumvent a ruling on crossnamespace redirects. IMO disambig pages like this with only one entry should be considered as redirects as thats essentially what they are Ydam 11:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Just get rid of it now for the obvious reason that, as Ydam said, it's a blatant attempt at avoiding WP rules. The creator of the article, User:Mboverload (who should clearly know better), in the edit history, even states: "Since crossnamespace redirects are not allowed I'll just use this disambig page." -- Kicking222 12:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Cross namespace disambiguations are fine as long as there's something to disambiguate between. Dab pages with single entries are very much deleteable. Speediable in my opinion, but I'll leave this alone, so we get concensus once and for all. - Mgm|(talk) 13:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I wont comment on the cross name disambiguation, since all I know is that VandalProof is a useful tool created by one of the wikipedia users. But since it is a dab page with only a single entry, its pretty much deletable. --Arnzy (whats up?) 13:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:SOFTWARE. —Lamentation :( 14:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.