Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagrant Downfall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A7. Naconkantari 05:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vagrant Downfall and David Beeler

Vagrant Downfall (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

David Beeler (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

hoax. Nothing about this band at artist direct, despite claims of great sales on their first album (and apparently on their second album which has been out for less than three days?), and no hits for '"Van's Warped Tour" "Vagrant Downfall"'. Also include their 16-year-old member, whose MySpace page name is the same name as the creator of the two articles. User:Zoe

• Delete complete bollocks form beginning to end. Guy (Help!) 00:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Shame hoaxes like this don't qualify for speedy deletion as patent nonsense. Resolute 00:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete More of a schoolkid fantasy than a "hoax" per se, as I doubt a Nazi album selling five billion copies in a single week is even remotely plausible to anyone. I don't see a whole lot of reason to keep this around even for four more days. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

It's all true I swear. Cmon guys

• • Not from what I saw on google. Turn up more data, please. --Dennisthe2 01:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom  ::mikmt 01:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BAND. I thought the fake footnote tags were amusing though... MrBeast 01:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Excellent BJAODN candidate, especially the second. Dancing with George W. Bush? theProject 01:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. This is an upstart band, and the only correct notation was by doing some research: they were indeed in Golden Skate, but it's not clear as to whether they won, only that they were finalists. --Dennisthe2 01:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - I removed the potentially defamatory material from the articles. The footnotes have nothing to do with the topics. There are no legitimate sources that refer to the topics. The Vagrant Downfall image looks photoshopped and lacks a license. The text of the articles spell hoax. If this AfD lasts more than twp days, then the hoax will have been a success. -- Jreferee 03:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• delete as quickly as possible. A hoax with unpleasant material --Slp1 03:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • In that case, a CSD A7 is in order on both of them. I'd throw in G1 as well for good measure, but the A7 will work. --Dennisthe2 04:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• speedy delete. No usable refs, possible hoax. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skapur (talk • contribs) 04:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.