Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ushi No Tane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 18:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ushi No Tane

Still no proof of notability, currently shows no way of pleasing Wikipedia's guidelines for Website Notability article bordering on fancruft J.J.Sagnella 07:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Clearly a lot of work has gone into this article, however this website is simply not notable. DarthVader 10:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • delete per nom. Also looks like advertising. Tychocat 11:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete under WP:WEB guidelines. --Arnzy (whats up?) 14:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't delete Ushi No Tane is a notable website noted in every major game-advice website from gamefaqs to game spot. Sorry if it seems like advertising, but the site is already tremendously popular and there is no need for advertising with 3000 active members growing every day. We just wanted a place to explain things about the site since people are always asking or confused about subjects. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.227.5.183 (talk • contribs) .
You still haven't told us how it meets wikipedia's rules for websites. Look at the top of this page for the link on thewords "webiste notability". J.J.Sagnella 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. nn. -- Steel 22:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete. If Wikipedia carries articles about minor things, such as Urine Drinking and Anal Leakage, I think we can make an exception. Considering Ushi No Tane is a very large community with many members and is linked to on almost every site mentioning Harvest Moon, including Wikipedia, I think that it is well enough to stay. TripleJump
  • Don't Delete. Ushi no Tane is a helpful website, not to mention fun. I agree with TriplejUmp, Wikipedia carries even the most random things, so why shouldn't it stay?
  • Delete per nom Aeon 03:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 14:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP is not a web directory. Argument from Triple Jump can be applied to any AfD. - Wickning1 15:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Not only that Wikipedia is not a democracy, so unless someone can say soon how it fits into the rules for websites, the article will not stay. J.J.Sagnella 15:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.