Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untied States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was withdraw from AFD. Punkmorten 20:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Untied States

Misspelled REDIRECT which covers up spelling errors. At this time there are no incoming links to this redirect-article. Kill it. Dutch-Bostonian 05:33, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Firstly, a misspelled redirect is kinda a good thing, because people can make mistakes when typing, either into the search bar, or in an article. Second, Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion is down the hall. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 05:41, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Agree with Saberwyn. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-16 06:36Z
• Keep it's a plausible transposition typo, and redirects are cheap. But if you really feel like deleting it, send it to RfD. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Useful redirect. FCYTravis 07:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per FCYTravis Crunch 16:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep' useful redirect for the typo-prone -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 17:04, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Not only is it an obviously useful redirect, AfD is not the place. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 19:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• I'm gonna be bold and end this. It doesn't belong on Articles for Deletion, and moreover it has only attracted keep votes so far. Punkmorten 20:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.