Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unopposed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unopposed

Unopposed (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This was an article that was originally listed as CsD. I feel that it has a little bit too much credibility to deleted it arbitrarily without an AfD. We have here another local band with questionable notability and a member lineup that is chronically unstable. Trusilver 18:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment This was speedied once before and has since been recreated and significantly expanded. Keeper | 76 18:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. But they are still not notable by our standards for bands. So I guess this means they are now Opposed? Keeper | 76 18:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. After the AfD, we will have to leave a message on their myspace pages saying that they need to change their name. :) Trusilver 01:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BAND. --EndlessDan 18:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Been through the article and as far as I can tell, it doesn't fulfil the criteria set out at WP:BAND. Simple as — alex.muller (talk • edits) 19:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose. Fails WP:BAND. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 01:03, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.