Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University College Dublin YFG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect optional. Mailer Diablo 19:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] University College Dublin YFG

Its the same reason for University College Cork YFG --Wild ride 11:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• delete per nom -- it does a better job asserting the importance of the topic, but I don't think it quite gets there.--SarekOfVulcan 16:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• merge and redirect to Young Fine Gael - it can be put in a new section along with the content from University College Cork YFG. No sense in deleting when far more trivial matters are left on Wikipedia, and in a worse state of prose. zoney ♣ talk 08:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Student organizations at a single school are generally non-notable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent State University College Republicans, which resulted in a delete, for comparison. --Metropolitan90 13:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Young Fine Gael is notable (youth branch of the second-largest political party in Ireland). Their having groups at various third level institutions is notable (the number of such institutions and size of the country is such that they would be widely known in Ireland). I fail to see how we need to delete information on the topic, even if separate articles are not desired. zoney ♣ talk 18:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable student organisation hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 18:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete student organisations are rarely notable. No objection to a merge Dlyons493 Talk 19:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Smerge into Young Fine Gael; there's good information here, but not so much that it needs its own article. Thinking of what's most useful for users of a general-purpose encyclopedia, ISTM that rather than merging it as it stands, the best thing would be to condense it down, so that the most important facts are easier to pick out. I'm not convinced everything in this article is worth keeping, but we certainly don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater; the simplest way to find out what's notable would probably be to let the editors of Young Fine Gael decide what they want to include there. — Haeleth Talk 21:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with that analysis and suggestion. zoney ♣ talk 23:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.