Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique creative thumbprint

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 23:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unique creative thumbprint

Unique creative thumbprint (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

unverifiable research NeilN 01:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Borderline nonsense, and likely original thought (I wouldn't call this "research"). Someguy1221 01:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

(Comment left on talk page of article by Human Traffic): "Unique Creative Thumbprint is a term used by Dr. Bernie Warren in his research. It is not unverfiable. It is in fact verifiable. It can be reviewed in his academic writings listed in the bibliography in "Dr. Bernie Warren" entry." Someone has an idea, doesn't give it an article. There is still the notability issue. Someguy1221 01:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. O"R" essay/neologism with no record of use. And a preemptive 'thumbs down' on the redlink integrative theatre adjacent in Bernie Warren.[1] [2] Seattlenow 01:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, completely WP:OR, neologism. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 16:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.