Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultzama valley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ultzama valley

Ultzama valley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article has only had relevant content created by 1 person. The article has no sources. The article is written more like a tour guide than a geographic article  Stewy5714talk 21:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  • ...which is more a reason for a rewrite than a deletion, no? Keep. Real place, real community of interest, real Wikipedia precedents, etc. Grutness...wha? 00:18, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Grutness is correct. The problems with the article is style and tone, not notability. Real place and major geographical location. --Oakshade (talk) 02:31, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep- Agree with above. Article needs complete rework but is very valid. Someone take a stab at this one! ---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 04:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per everyone else, although sources really are required.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Reluctant keep The article doesn't meet deletion criteria [[1]]. Geographical articles are usually given much leeway as geographical sites are considered notable, even if only small towns. WP policy is to improve by editing, not delete. This is an article that needs to be rewritten. I will try to help or contact those who can help. Archtransit (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 22:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.