Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubervisor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. DS 14:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ubervisor

Protologism coined by a blogger. Exactly one relevant google hit: the blog linked to in the article. Note that the IBM S/390 nested virtualization architecture paper linked to doesn't mention the term ubervisor at all. -- Koffieyahoo 01:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, WP:NEO applies, and usually a blog does not meet WP:RS. That second article is totally irrelevant. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:12, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: No currency for the term, and the general explanation of nested visors is kind of irrelevant. Geogre 02:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. Also failed personal walkup tests with co-worker mainframe dinos. "What? You mean hypervisor, right?" — MrDolomite | Talk 03:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.