Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPOhtml

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 07:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UPOhtml

UPOhtml (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I've tried to clean this article up, at the start it was nothing but advertising hyperbole. (see versions before my edits). The company website says "coming soon", and googling returns two relevant hits other then Wikipedia. One is a web forum where apparently the creator of the software was trying to find some beta testers. There are no sources on this article, nor any real commentary that I can see on the web. As a side note, checking the article before I attempted to clean it up, shows that there was supposed to be a final release around September. It is now February, and there is no news about this release, or really any conversation going on at all on the general internet. LinEagle (talk) 07:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Advert, never asserts notability. Not many relevant Google hits (many are to forums and Wikipedia mirrors like Answers.com) Doc Strange (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources about the product. Search results show a lot of directory type entries where it is one a whole slew of HTML editors being listed. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.