Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twixel Lore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A note about the nomination: "Not notable" is fairly vague, and though I won't go as far as the WP:ATA essay which deems such arguments invalid, I will say that it does not contribute much to the discussion and can easily be refuted by someone with something more specific. In this case it doesn't matter much, but in the future it is advisable to delve a bit deeper to make a more detailed argument. In this case the fact that the topic is from an unpublished work (as pointed out by Quasirandom) and is therefore original research and unverifiable. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Twixel Lore

Twixel Lore (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

• article is also copied at Twixel Fairies—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanbly (talk • contribs)
• I have WP:PRODed both articles. Discussion should be terminated or suspended as deletion may be uncontested, and in any case the other article needs to be appended here. Potatoswatter (talk) 08:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• I believe AfDs take precidence over PRODs, though. In any case, delete -- fictional race from an unpublished work, which doesn't meet WP:FICT. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• By whatever means necessary, delete this patent nonsense and its sister article. Qworty (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.