Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turing, Kenneth Alan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Supressão (For the Portuguese authorities ;) per WP:SNOW—Preceding unsigned comment added by SkierRMH (talk • contribs)
[edit] Turing, Kenneth Alan
No evidence this person exists, just a rambling conspiracy theory. Dougie WII (talk) 03:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Putting aside the huge amounts of MOS work that needs to be done, including moving the page to correct the title, I say delete per the nom's reason. Long, rambling "article", which doesn't provide any real encyclopedic context. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:26, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Poor Kenneth. Not only is he fighting to prove that he's the secret grandson of a top scientist, his Wikipedia biography is a strange little article with lots of footnotes which don't actually mention the secret grandson of Alan Turing. At least he's getting help from the Portugese authorities. Not just a hoax, but a bad pulp fiction imitation hoax. Mandsford (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Sadly, this is not sufficiently similar to the deleted version of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Alan Turing to apply speedy deletion criterion G4 — it is far longer and ramblier — but that only makes it more delete-worthy. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete using shredder and burn bag. This information is still eyes-only and disclosure on Wikipedia is a serious breach of all applicable regulations. --Dhartung | Talk 06:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete even if the subject is actually notable, the structure and the style need to be ripped out and started over .... minimum. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- delete a fascinating romp through the lexicon of conspiracy theory buzz-word bingo sheets, aimed more at the heart than the head. Earns special mention for name-dropping Project MKULTRA more times than I could keep track of (I was distracted by founting the fnords). Delete as WP:OR & failing WP:V. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
