Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tupalo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tupalo

Tupalo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. Low Alexa rank Computerjoe's talk 09:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:WEB, makes no assertion of notability and has no references. Tried poking around on Google and all I could find were blogs that brought it up - many of which pointed out the fact that the service was "Too new to have much info". Interesting concept but lacks reliable sourcing at this time. Come back with it after it's gotten some reviews or such. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rlevse 13:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete- does not have reliable sources and isnt notable.--Joebengo 22:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete, no indication found of meeting WP:WEB guideline or WP:ATT core policy. Suggest redirect to Tupelo as the most common misspelling. Barno 03:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• delete. . Mukadderat 17:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.