Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuna conspiracy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted - hoax/patent nonsense. - Mike Rosoft 21:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tuna conspiracy

Tuna conspiracy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Mildly amusing hoax; the book referred to in support does not exist [1] Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 16:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete hoax. SolidPlaid 16:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, clearly fake. Doctorfluffy 17:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete most likely a hoax. Cryo921 19:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete hoax. Dr van Nostrom doesn't seem to exist either. Hut 8.5 20:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.