Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 05:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Troll wars
Subject doesn't need a separate article. Flaming (Internet) and Troll (Internet) would be better places to mention the small amount of information presented here. In my view an article on this specific topic can only invite the creation of pointless lists of flame wars and troll activity. Robotman1974 07:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete; you pretty much said all I would have liked to on the matter. (|-- UlTiMuS 07:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Robotman1974 07:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Xdenizen 07:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. yandman 08:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --- RockMFR 08:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Shimeru 09:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Grutness...wha? 11:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete in addition to being unencyclopedic and unsourced, all it really says is that troll wars are wars between trolls. Gee, I wonder if duck wars are wars between ducks, and bicycle-repairman wars are wars between bicycle repairmen? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - That's a dangerous line of reasoning to continue. World Wars are not wars between worlds, nor are Revolutionary Wars wars between revolutionaries. The article certainly deserves to be deleted, but not because the name obviously implies the meaning. →Bobby← 14:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Reply In WP:CSD, criteria A3 , "Any article consisting only of... a rephrasing of the title." is speediable. I'm not sure if I would have speedied this, but reasons to delete it certainly are abundant. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- And I certainly wouldn't say troll wars are wars between trolls. That would imply physical violence, something that is usually lacking on the Internet... --- RockMFR 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- ... and Glasgow Ice Cream Wars are wars between Glasgow ice-creams? ☺ Uncle G 18:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, why is that a redlink?! </surprise> And redirect this to troll, it is a plausible search term. Kavadi carrier 03:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Those sounds tasty to me! Delete. --humblefool® 20:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - That's a dangerous line of reasoning to continue. World Wars are not wars between worlds, nor are Revolutionary Wars wars between revolutionaries. The article certainly deserves to be deleted, but not because the name obviously implies the meaning. →Bobby← 14:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination. Hello32020 14:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete too short and not enough information, links, sources and is already in more than one article. Let's delete and go home...-ECH3LON 15:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, article is very lame and is nonsense. --Terence Ong (C | R) 15:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Troll Internet as this is a likely search term. Capitalistroadster 02:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
