Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TriMicSlots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TriMicSlots

TriMicSlots (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested PROD. No sources to assert notability, substantiate claims, or even prove it's existence. DarkAudit (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I hate to break WP:PERNOM, but my only opinion for now is Delete per nom, since DarkAudit has made several good points against the article. Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 18:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete No sources, notablitiy, and very little information to support the article to cover all aspects of the subject. Dusti^{talk to me} 18:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as it fails WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 19:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Dreamspy (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete The game was banned because it was too addictive? Nominator has made several good points to delete, the only thing I can add is that it's a possible hoax due to the addiction and ban statements. SWik78 (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  • There's nothing to show that the game that was "banned" ever existed, either. The links go to slot machines and arcade games, but that's it. DarkAudit (talk) 16:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.