Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torr the Relentless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 11:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Torr the Relentless

this article contains no information as to its importance or notability. I vote Delete Deyyaz 22:35, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

• Merge with Guild Wars but I'm leaning towards an outright delete here. It's a Guild Wars boss [1], but nowhere near notable enough for its own article. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 22:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, since there's nothing to merge. Only thing you could say is that there is a boss called Tor the Relentless in the article, which would probably be confusing, since I'm assuming this isn't the only one. If someone made a list of guild wars monsters or whatever (and it was considered encyclopedic), it could be included there. - Bobet 22:56, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • considering that A) the main guildwars article has no mention of Torr the Relentless and B) this article has some information not included in the guildwars article, I suggest that a merge is reasonable. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 03:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as sub-sub-stub that is incapable of expansion. Eddie.willers 23:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Just a comment here (and I know I am asking for trouble by doing this) but why do you say "incapable of expansion"? I would argue that it could be expanded quite a bit more than it is. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 03:46, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• As it is now, it has no real info; just a few blank sections and some redlinks. If somebody wants to try to expand it, maybe I'd change my opinion, but as it is now I'd say delete. Perhaps a brief mention of this creature should be added to Guild Wars. *Dan T.* 04:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • It is not presently mentioned in Guild Wars, and, as it is a boss, I think that it is certainly notable within the sphere of the Guild Wars world, and hence should be mentioned there. Which, as far as I am aware, equates to a merge. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 01:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.