Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toonophobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Toonophobia

• keep The article is sourced and is a real phenomena. It may seem ridiculous because it is , but is is nevertheless a very real phenomeneon.--CltFn 06:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Basically a hoax. Original author has even stuck the humor tag on it. At best is a non notable nelogism. I originally stuck a speedy on it as nonsense, yet original author decided to remove it instead of sticking a hangon. Even though they stuck the humor template on it, it is not even that funny.Delete TheRingess 06:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Made up word, Toonophobia is not a real Phobia --lightdarkness ^(talk) 06:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Chris 07:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Does a separate AfD need to be done for the humor tag? Schizombie 07:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as made up word. --Terence Ong 08:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This needs a flashing red Satire sign, a la Monty Python's Architect sketch. Attempt at humour that misses the mark by a mile.  (aeropagitica)  16:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - possbly speedy, given that it says it's non-factual. Maybe recreate as a redirect to Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, since ISTR Bob Hoskins' character in that suffered from toonophobia. Grutness...wha? 23:12, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not funny. Pavel Vozenilek 23:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete yes not funny and per nom. --James 23:46, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. — Indi ^{[ talk ]} 19:01, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.