The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as spam and copyright violation of [1]. Kimchi.sg 16:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Tagged for deletion as lacking context. This article is terrible, but the subject may be salvageable. Or it may not. Guy (Help!) 11:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete G11 - blatant advertising. Also lacks context. Walton monarchist89 13:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyvio from [2]. So tagged. Hut 8.5 16:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.