Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Mills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nishkid64 01:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Mills

Tony Mills (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Not a notable person. Pinkkeith 20:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, not a notable physician, and this is not a notable award. --Dhartung | Talk 06:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • No opinion. I'm just noting that the award, International Mister Leather, has a wikipedia article that has gone uncontested as to its notability. Sancho McCann 07:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 01:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep (I don't often vote keep). The award is notable and several of the references satisfy WP:V. Mr. Leather is not a notable documentary but Beyond Vanilla does have an IMDB entry. Between the leather title, a mention in The Advocate and the documentary appearance, satisfies WP:N. Shaundakulbara 03:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, for the same reason that we might keep an article about any person who has won an international beauty contest -- The Anome 08:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep While the award is clearly useless, like any beauty pageant in my opinion, the award is clearly notable, so its winners are too. Mgm|(talk) 11:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep, while the subject seems to be up to standard the article is not Alf photoman 15:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep It seems silly, but if the award is notable then it leads toward the winners being notable. The stature of being a physician contrasts with the seediness of the leather contest, makes it interesting enough to include. Where is the harm? --Kevin Murray 19:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree that the award is notable, but it's the only the award and related coverage that makes this guy notable. That's adequately covered on the awards page. This page doesn't add additional worthwhile information. JCO312 20:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • delete There are no other winners of the award in WP. The refs refer to two different things: one clinical trial and two lay press mentions as a physician--which would never be enough for N as an MD,

and the others incidental to the award.DGG 01:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep A notable award winner and member of the Leather subculture. Should we add that his predecessor was Kevin Cwayna and his successor was Bruce Chopnik? User:Dimadick
  • Delete Traces of notability via the award aren't enough. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.