Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tnlforum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 02:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tnlforum

Non-notable web forum. This is mostly just recapping the message board's history and notable users. No encyclopedic value. Metros232 00:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Alexa ranking of >55,000. ... discospinster _talk 00:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment And that's just for the website itself. This article is about the message board on the site. So it's the non-notable forum of a non-notable website. Metros232 00:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Whilst an Alexa rating of below 100,000 isn't too bad when compared to the entire net (once you take factor in the problems with Alexa ratings), the article is forum vanity with little encyclopedic value. No references or indication that references should exist - and when there's no references possible, I vote to delete. LinaMishima 02:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NCurse _work 14:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not needed to be put on Wikipedia. -AMK152 15:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep An informative and valuable article. To loose it would be a disaster. -- Bpazolli 15:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, "informative" and "valuable" are not reasons to keep. Lack of reliable sources about how this site meets inclusion criteria for websites are, however, good reasons to suggest deletion. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not needed ST47 16:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The article is as unencyclopedic as it gets. Wikipedia is not MySpace. JIP | Talk 18:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Metros232. - Duane 18:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's nn rootology (T) 23:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn forum advert.--Jersey Devil 23:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete not needed. wikipedia guest 14:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC) Invalid signature—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.177.2.243 (talk • contribs)
• Keep The message board actually has a history of general interest as relevant as nearly any other currently active Internet community. With a proper rewrite, it would be revealed. I am the owner of the site and can work with other veteran members to edit this page. Nvlamakis 22:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Can you show which aspect(s) of WP:WEB your forum meets and how you intend to show it using reliable sources in this proposed rewrite? Metros232 22:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.