Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy osborne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE as patent nonsense. JIP | Talk 05:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Timothy osborne

Timothy osborne (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article is a hoax. Editor has used false edit summary to remove a prod tag. (I realize this isn't grounds for deletion, but it does indicate bad faith on the part of the creator.) External links lead to unrelated pages and article is internally inconsistent. (ie It's impossible for a composer born in the 1900s to have been part of the Classical era.) Gimme danger (talk) 05:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - its a rip-off and bodge of the Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart page which I think puts its Hoax qualifications beyond any doubt or need for discussion! -Hunting dog (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately hoaxes do not fall under the WP:CSD and the editor removed the prod tag. (as well as the afd tag several times) Gimme danger (talk) 05:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete This article is a hoax. I think the creator of this article should be blocked from editing. Masterpiece2000 05:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• My demands are delete and salt before blocking the author indefinitely. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 05:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.