Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Tippins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Tippins

{{prod}} was removed without a reason. Does not appear notable. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 11:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

PROD is meant to be removed. Griping about it in AfD nominations only encourages the perception that it cannot be removed by the General Public (a misconception that has already caused a lot of unnecessary stress when it was plaguing CSD). Also, since AfD is not a vote, you really don't need to add that big bold thingy at the end there before your signature. Nominations often set the tone of an AfD discussion, and a poor nomination is just asking for the ensuing discussion to be equally worthless. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete 108 GHits, nn person. Ruaraidh-dobson 11:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Not only does he only get 108 hits on Google (112 for mine, actually), but at least the first 50 are unrelated to the fellow in this article. If there's verifiable information about this bloke floating around, the article's author really needs to produce it, because I can't see it. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 12:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete seems non-notable --RMHED 13:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The unsourced article makes no claim that he satisfies WP:MUSIC. --Metropolitan90 14:21, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN fails WP:MUSIC --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 14:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Also, yeah, Prod is meant to be removed, that's the poit of it, but you're also supposed to give a reason why when you do it. --PresN 16:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• You're supposed to because it's polite, and it means the Intelligent Deletionist (ID) may just stop and think before arguing on AfD (assuming, of course, you provide a decent reason for removing it). However, you don't have to. "PROD removed without explanation" is not a valid reason for deletion, and is not relevant to an AfD. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 10:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.