Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Lee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Philippe 15:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tim Lee

This is not a majority vote. If someone brought this page to your attention, or you brought this page to others' attention, please make a note of this fact here. While widespread participation is encouraged, the primary purpose of this page is to gauge consensus of a representative sample of Wikipedians; therefore, it's important to know whether someone is actively soliciting others from a non-neutral location to discuss. Such contributors are not prohibited from commenting, but it's important for the closing administrator or bureaucrat to know how representative the participants are of Wikipedians generally. See Wikipedia:Canvassing.


Tim Lee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable local radio host. Badger Drink (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment This guy does exist [1] However, the article would obviously need to be completely re-written. I'll see what I can do. J.delanoygabsadds 14:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete What I said above is true, but his bio on the webpage is unsuitable for encyclopedic information. Doing a Google search for "Tim Lee" Australia Hot30 Countdown produced nothing substantial. This is what the page looks like without all the nonsense on it. This guy is not notable enough to keep the article with just one sentence. J.delanoygabsadds 14:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep the first sentence of the lead paragraph. Delete the rest. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 14:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment- So, this person is real, but the questions of notablility and reliable sources still exsist. Do we have enough secondary sources to keep the article? Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 15:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. Didn't the nominator, or anyone else who has looked at this, think of removing all of the nonsense from this article? It only takes a few seconds - no more than it takes to comment in an AfD. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
    You seem to say this as if removing the nonsense would somehow turn Mr. Lee into a notable figure. --Badger Drink (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • No, I'm not saying that at all. What I meant is that several people read an article which contained obvious WP:BLP violations and did nothing about it. That sort of thing needs to be edited out immediately. I gave no opinion on notability, and still give none. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I prefer waiting for the close of an AfD before doing something like this. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 22:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.