Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tile installation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-09 08:52Z

[edit] Tile installation

Tile installation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:IMG 1944.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:IMG 1955.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:IMG 1959 up.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Wikipedia is not a how to guide. Further, contains nothing that, as far as I can see, isn't already covered in tile. Delete (not merge). --Nlu (talk) 04:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• Belongs on Wikihow, but that's a different license, I think. Can we Transwiki accordingly? --Dennisthe2 06:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wikihow is not a Wikimedia Foundation project. --Dhartung | Talk 07:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
  • That is not an impediment to transwikification. The incompatible licence, that denies free use to certain people, is the impediment. Uncle G 15:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Edeans 08:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP:NOT#INFO --JJLatWiki 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete a most unusual article which I found quite amusing especially since someone has gone to the trouble of adding pictures. not suitable for an encyclopedia, but I think this person should submit their guide to a DIY site --PrincessBrat 20:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.