Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three Ravens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three Ravens

This page is not suitable for Wikipedia (see WP:NOT) and this page is a sort of original research (including neologisms such as "three ravens") --Questionfromjapan 02:19, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Nothing on Google, Google Scholar or Google Books or Factiva. The Japanese military during WWII is hardly an obscure topic. I would give some leeway due to the Japanese language factor EXCEPT that the Three Ravens article specifically says that the information is available (or even first uncovered!) in published English books - including one by the famous Edgar Snow. Bwithh 02:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Bwithh. Paddles ^T_C 03:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO and WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete internal spammed WP:NOR Ste4k 09:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to The Three Ravens. SM247^{My Talk} 10:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverifiable and quite possibly bogus. --Saintjust 10:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 16:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable, possible original research. --Tachyon01 18:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Wikibout-Talk to me! 20:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom--Celldea 06:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Zos 23:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.