Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomson-Reuters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 02:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thomson-Reuters

Thomson-Reuters (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:Crystal Afid4 12:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. Official Thomson press release: "... the boards of Thomson and Reuters announce that they have today agreed to combine the two groups. ... Thomson will be renamed Thomson-Reuters Corporation." MartinHagberg 12:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep WP:CRYSTAL states that: Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. It is certainly a notable merger and judging by this [1], it's definitely going to happen. The article is sourced properly and should be kept. --Cyrus Andiron 13:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Article, as it stands now, is well-sourced and clearly passes WP:CRYSTAL. -- Seed 2.0 14:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep well sourced article on a company that definitely will form, clearly passes WP:CRYSTAL Hut 8.5 16:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep its well-known that the companies will merge into one Black Harry (T|C) 17:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep There is no justification for deleting this article. The two companies have merged to create Thomson-Reuters. They are now one. I vote to keep. TerritorialWaters 20:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep per above. It should be noted that the nominator has contributions to wikipedia spanning all of a 6 minute period, during which he/she nominated this article and Gretchen (band) for deletion, with no argument other than linking to a guideline or policy. Charlie 20:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.