Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas H. Chance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thomas H. Chance
Seems to fail the professor test: major claim to fame is posting to a Usenet group. No sources outside of that group. Guy (Help!) 17:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. - PoliticalJunkie 21:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Need more than posts to Usenet groups in order to establish/confirm notability. The University's website lists a "Thomas H Chance" as a lecturer of languages and literature (not sure what OFC B stands for) [1]. Doesn't appear that there is a full professor by that name though. WjBscribe 01:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 02:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I find it odd that he's said to be a classics professor at UC Davis, and yet the UC Davis Classics Program faculty list doesn't mention him. WjB's link calls him a "lecturer in summer session" which seems likely to be a lesser position than the standard lecturer, and not one held by an academic of any prominence. The usenet thing is an interesting bit of color which I think should be irrelevant for this discussion: not evidence of notability, obviously, but also not something to hold against him. —David Eppstein 03:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete It seems he got his degree in 86, made usennet posts in 95 through 97, wrote up his dissertation into this one book--found in every university library--and then disappeared from the scholarly scene. He's not even in ratemyprofessors for Davis. Probably has an interesting life, but until someone tells us more, I don't see how we can keep the article. DGG 05:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
