Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Girl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] This Girl
Does not assert enough information. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 01:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)d
- Delete. I was about to vote speedy keep because AfD is not an expand tag, but I can't find any hard evidence that this album exists. Searching has turned up several different release dates (2003, 2005, 2006...). Nothing on Amazon. Furthermore, the artist only barely makes it under WP:MUSIC for being signed to a notable record label. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and NN -- Alias Flood 02:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable, per nom. Also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Alphachimp talk 03:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. That Girl she isn't! --Brad101 03:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 04:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, she's on a major label, and the album has been announced. I found this MTV link in the 4th google result, too. I personally wish she were That Dog. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and carry off to the dump. An unreleased record by an artist who has never released a record. WilyD 12:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Alphachimp. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball applies. If her album does well, perhaps this can be recreated. Scorpiondollprincess 14:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, "crystal ball" doesn't apply here, as the future event is verifiable. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think it does for we dont know if this album or artist will become notable.-(chubbstar) — talk | contrib | 14:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- The artist is already notable for having a charting single. As the song is going to be on this album, apparently, the album gains nobility because of it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment if you can cite verifiable sources on this album's future notability, I'd consider changing my position. Likewise if you can cite sources on where and how well the single charted, I might be persuaded to change. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball applies. Note: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable" and "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." A yet-to-be-released debut album is not notable (and conceivably could be shelved and remain unreleased). As others have mentioned, this can be recreated after the album is actually released. Scorpiondollprincess 16:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've already linked the MTV listing for her, which verifies the album on top of her website. That fulfills the WP:NOT requirement in this case --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment if you can cite verifiable sources on this album's future notability, I'd consider changing my position. Likewise if you can cite sources on where and how well the single charted, I might be persuaded to change. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball applies. Note: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable" and "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." A yet-to-be-released debut album is not notable (and conceivably could be shelved and remain unreleased). As others have mentioned, this can be recreated after the album is actually released. Scorpiondollprincess 16:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- The artist is already notable for having a charting single. As the song is going to be on this album, apparently, the album gains nobility because of it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think it does for we dont know if this album or artist will become notable.-(chubbstar) — talk | contrib | 14:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, "crystal ball" doesn't apply here, as the future event is verifiable. --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:47, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Can be remade when more info arises.-(chubbstar) — talk | contrib | 14:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per badlydrawnjeff, clearly notable enough for a wikipedia entry. Amazinglarry 18:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Coredesat Dpv 00:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete until a verifiable source arises that proves the album is notable. --Gray Porpoise 00:57, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only isn't there a verifiable source that she charted a single, there is a verifiable source that she didn't chart a single, here. Sorry, but that makes the song, the album, and the artist non-notable. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Aguerriero. Non-notable, should not be on Wikipedia. --Tuspm(C | @) 21:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
