Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vulcan Fetus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete - if not g1 nonsense/hoax, then WP:SNOW. Will protect. NawlinWiki 15:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Vulcan Fetus

The Vulcan Fetus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable band speedied multiple times. Finally they added assertions of notability, two albums that sold over five million copies. Only problem is, this band looks so far below the radar that, if they ever sold a CD, it was likely from the trunk of their car. Google finds ten hits total, half of which look like Star Trek references having nothing to do with the band. Not verifiable, not notable. Fan-1967 21:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Their alleged gold album, 'Ecumenical Catharsis Through Intraveneous Transmissions', gets zero, count 'em, zero Google hits. Abort. -Toptomcat 22:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as obvious lie (and my mom told me lies were baaaad) -- lucasbfr talk 22:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non verifiable non notable. lies are not speedy, but hoax is. But anyway, we are not in a hurry, slow is good. Should this be protected if it has been re-created before?Obina 22:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Nope, hoax not speediable either. Actually, getting an AFD will be useful in order to G4 it later. Probably will need salting, based on the log. Fan-1967 22:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and then salt the earth Things like this:
At 2:50 PM Mountain Standard Time, This page was nominated to be deleted in accordance with the mandate that Wikipedia operates in. Fuck you Wikipedia, you all suck.
are fairly unacceptable as far as article content goes, and it's fairly likely that the author of the article is going to post it again. Still no reliable sourcing or accurate assertions of notability. Cheers, Lankybugger 23:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt, hoaxish crap. Sandstein 23:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and protect the article from recreation. There are no reliable sources to back up the one assertion of notability that this article makes. (aeropagitica) 23:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete A7 and Salt the earth. So tagged for A7, anyone have a salt shaker? --Dennisthe2 00:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and Salt Fails WP:BAND, hoax. —ShadowHalo 02:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.