Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Docg 01:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Shed

The Shed (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is quite the hodge-podge article. No less than five different subjects in the same article, only one of which (the song by Rainbow) appears to be notable, but not so notable as to require its own article. So, what to do with the space? 1) Disambiguate, adding a note for Prophet Five from Alias. 2) Merge the song information to the Rainbow article and delete the rest. 3) Redirect somewhere, with my preference being to Prophet Five. 4) Some other solution. Otto4711 23:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. It appears to be the nebulous form of a disambiguation article, but it's a disambig for things that don't seem to actually appear here on Wikipedia, making a disambig unneeded at this time. --Dennisthe2 02:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I've heard of Shed FM but a cursory google didn't find reliable sources. --Dhartung | Talk 23:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • And I didn't actually express an opinion in making the nomination, did I? Redirect to Prophet Five. Otto4711 00:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete The radio station only covers a small section of northwestern Melbourne, which is almost entirely non-Aboriginal. Other refs appear non-notable. Agree with Dennisthe2's comments. I would go with: 2) merge song info to Rainbow article and delete the rest, and 3) redirect to Prophet Five. Orderinchaos78 04:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Aboriginal radio?? Northwest Melbourne?? The Shed Magazine is made by unemployed people from Northwest Melbourne and has a worldwide distribution. Where you think it has anything to do with aboriginals is as clueless as your reasons for wanting to delete it.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.