Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Safehouse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Safehouse

It may well be "one of the best communities around. Ever", but it's still non-notable per WP:WEB. Contested PROD. Sandstein 12:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete nn guild vanity MLA 12:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable as per above. Chairman S. Talk 13:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - nn, per above. --lightdarkness (talk) 13:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn, vanity. --Terence Ong 16:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

*Delete This is the rogue version of The Ranger's Glade. If you played EQ you probably knew about it. That does not make it notable though. The Steel Warriors is probably next on the list. Maybe I'll get to make a sour grapes joke. kotepho 16:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

    • Keep I think the article now asserts a reasonable amount of notability. I wouldn't say for sure it is the first to promote and have changes actually take place though. kotepho 01:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I edited the article and took out the vanity points. The Safehouse is unusual in the field of community gaming sites because they were the first to show that players could influence gameplay. This makes them notable, also, they have been a reference for several game companies and have official affiliate status from Sigil Games Online.
  • Delete per WP:BALLS. Random vanity, plenty of weblinks. Stifle 23:47, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.