Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Radiation Angels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Radiation Angels

This page corresponds to the author listed above (James Daniel Ross) for deletion, google gathers 105 hits for this book title. This isn't notable. Porqin 12:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep under WP:Book Notability Criteria which states, "Usually, books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries ... and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify." Book has an ISBN (1594262101), is available through Amazon.com and has been reviewed there. I think it narrowly squeaks by notability guidelines. Scorpiondollprincess 13:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment "Nonetheless there is no dictum against any book that is reasonably spread or otherwise well-known or remarkable." Reading the paragraph prior, you have to formulate a consensus on each individual book, regardless of an ISBN. 105 google hits usually signifies not reasonably spread or well-known material. --Porqin 15:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I only found 1 book review, by an independent reviewer, not associated with any particular publication. Having an ISBN is necessary but nowhere near sufficient for notability: i mean, please, every book has one if it's a real book. This is vanity material, as far as I can tell. Mangojuice^talk 20:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mangojuice. --Satori Son 21:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ezeu 16:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable enough. Recury 17:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Akradecki 18:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 37 distinct Ghits including wiki = non-notable Dlyons493 Talk 22:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.