Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mugshots
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Mugshots
User:193.122.31.188 posted the following on the talk page
- "Despite claiming to have invented a genre, this band appears to be non-notable. Only a handful of hits for 'The Mugshots' and 'undead rock' in google. Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSIC. Delete. 193.122.31.188 09:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)"
and then placed the talk page on the Log page as substitute for deletion discussion page. Hopefully I have completed the listing properly. blue520 10:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - A note should be posted on the "How to" that non logged in users can not put a page up for AfD as they can not create the discussion page required.--blue520 10:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- I only discovered this after adding the afd tag to the article. On a related note, there should be a method which allows anons to nominate articles for AfD. 193.122.31.188
- In which case we'd get AfDspammed from the high school shared IPs; no thanks! I'm quite comfy with saving it for regusers. That aside, after going over the article and info, this looks NN to me. Delete. RGTraynor 14:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Anons can still raise AfDs, they just can't finalise them because they can't start new articles so it requires a registered user to step in - it's something I've done on a number of occasions now and it's no big deal compared to the official ruling on anons and new articles MLA 17:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Anons can also register for an account. It doesn't hurt :) Stifle (talk) 23:06, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Anons can still raise AfDs, they just can't finalise them because they can't start new articles so it requires a registered user to step in - it's something I've done on a number of occasions now and it's no big deal compared to the official ruling on anons and new articles MLA 17:46, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- In which case we'd get AfDspammed from the high school shared IPs; no thanks! I'm quite comfy with saving it for regusers. That aside, after going over the article and info, this looks NN to me. Delete. RGTraynor 14:52, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- I only discovered this after adding the afd tag to the article. On a related note, there should be a method which allows anons to nominate articles for AfD. 193.122.31.188
- Delete non-notable, full of potential but short on notability MLA 17:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Hetar 19:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 23:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Moe ε 17:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
