Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Golden Briefs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as vandalism. - Bobet 17:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Golden Briefs

The Golden Briefs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unverifiable, this just may be a hoax, well, I can't find anything that verifies this, anywhere. Gelreoz-0 10:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: "Johnny Depp makes a cameo at the end as a hot-dog vendor". You doubt?--SeizureDog 10:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: There is a history of hoaxes relating to briefs, for instance "Adolf Hitler's briefs" and others. Punkmorten 11:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
    • They seem to last only very briefly. =^_^= --Dennisthe2 17:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Uhh, let's just say, for laughs, that this is is not a hoax...does Wikipedia need an article on a purely speculative, future gay pornography film? Wavy G 13:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
    • This whole thing may just be a big joke, as the nominator has no prior editing history, other than editing the article in question one minute after its creation, and then nominating it for deletion one minute later. Wavy G 13:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Surely this is notable?? and besides, it's not a harmful page. --SambaDiJaneiro2314 15:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Samba, you'd be surprised at just how harmful this can be. As for notability, where is it? I see no assertion here - so no, surely this is not notable. If it is, change my mind. --Dennisthe2 17:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. At best, crystalballery, at worst, a hoax. I can almost say vandalism, assuming it is a vandalicious hoax. Almost. --Dennisthe2 17:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Hoax or non notable, needs to be deleted either way. -- Infrogmation 17:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.