Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cake Tin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Westpac Stadium after early closure as requested by nominator. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Cake Tin

The Cake Tin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article information already found at Westpac Stadium - delete and redirect. --Hamedog_Talk|^@ 18:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Agreed. There isn't any more info in the small stub than currently exists in Westpac Stadium. Redirect. --Brad Beattie (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Article merger does not involve deletion at any stage. When you see duplicate articles discussing the same thing, Wikipedia:Duplicate articles should be your first port of call, not AFD. Uncle G 19:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • None of the information in The Cake Tin is worth keeping though.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 19:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
    • So step #5 of the article merger process is going to be a simple one. That does not make deletion a part of the process. Uncle G 21:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
      • Okay so this can be closed (!ADMIN!!!) and I will create a redirect.--Hamedog_Talk|^@ 21:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.