Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The~Brick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Luna Santin 23:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The~Brick

The~Brick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Delete, no evidence that this publication is remotely close to noteworthy based on WP:RS. The more I look at it and the photographs, the more it looks like something made up in a school in Glendale one day, despite the grandiose claims of "boasted readership on four continents," but I'll pass it on to other sets of eyes. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete. By their very nature, zines tend to be very limited in their scope, generally having little more than a following within a very, VERY narrow scope. Two, this is already a dead zine. Three, as per the nom, no reliable sources. --Dennisthe2 22:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I was a student in the Bay Area during that time and never heard/saw of that 'zine, and I'm very eclectic in my reading! Beside that, fails WP:V, WP:RS and notability issues. SkierRMH 23:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, and no sources to back it up. See above comments.Ganfon 00:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and Dennisthe2. Stifle (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.