Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Hurt (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Nakon 16:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Big Hurt (band)

The Big Hurt (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable local band with very little non-trivial media coverage. One self-released album, no hits, etc., etc.. Fails WP:MUSIC. Main contributors to the article—if they're not the same person (see their edit summaries)—all appear to be connected to the band. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete. The refs are all borderline, but in the end they seem to fall just short of significant third-party coverage as required in WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep - they have supported some apparently notable acts which, I guess, should confer a whiff of notability to them. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 13:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• Just opening for notable acts doesn't make you notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 13:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• Weak delete per TenPoundHammer. Stifle (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
• Weak delete per TenPoundHammer.Divinediscourse (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.