Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temple Beth Or
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Temple Beth Or
No indication of this temple's prominince is given. Google shows there are about 16,000 synagogues with this exact same name. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for reason above. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do not delete. What must I edit in order to keep it? Should I give the website? Tamajared 16:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Expanding is always a good idea (and websites for subjects which have them is always recommended), but I doubt you could expand it enough to prove that the temple is notable enough to deserve an entry in the 'pedia. There are millions of churches/temples/mospques around the world—we're not going to create articles for every one of them. If you can include information on why this one temple is very notable (e.g. First temple to be included in the Guinness Book of World Records, First temple to be completely constructed by blind masonists, etc.), it is less likely to be deleted. Otherwise, it's just another local temple that people can find by surfing the 'net. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I see your point. I would not have added this article if I hadn't seen others that ALSO lack information, such as Temple Beth Am.
- Go ahead and nominate that one for deletion. I just happened to come across yours. :-S — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know how to delete pages. Tamajared 17:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- See the instructions in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know how to delete pages. Tamajared 17:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Go ahead and nominate that one for deletion. I just happened to come across yours. :-S — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I see your point. I would not have added this article if I hadn't seen others that ALSO lack information, such as Temple Beth Am.
- Expanding is always a good idea (and websites for subjects which have them is always recommended), but I doubt you could expand it enough to prove that the temple is notable enough to deserve an entry in the 'pedia. There are millions of churches/temples/mospques around the world—we're not going to create articles for every one of them. If you can include information on why this one temple is very notable (e.g. First temple to be included in the Guinness Book of World Records, First temple to be completely constructed by blind masonists, etc.), it is less likely to be deleted. Otherwise, it's just another local temple that people can find by surfing the 'net. — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:54, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I have just listed Temple Beth Am for deletion here. Wildthing61476 17:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete parishcruft (I know that Judiasm doesn't have parishes, but individual temples and parish churches are generally nn). Carlossuarez46 18:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- few synagogues qualify as any more notable than individual churches. Haikupoet 00:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Most individual religious congregations are non-notable. --Metropolitan90 02:14, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
