Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telbathia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Telbathia

Non-notable game, google produces nothing on this, mostly how-to guide. Seraphimblade 20:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Natalie 20:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• It is not a how to guide. It simply explains the rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by St. Brian (talk • contribs)
• You may want to look at the D&D entry or a similar entry to see how gameplay is described there. The notability is still a problem, though, even if the article's gameplay section is rewritten. Natalie 21:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• I am looking to get it published though. However, now people can play it! User: St. Brian
• Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. Natalie 21:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or possible Speedy under G12. This is a strange one, though: for an apparent vanity/spam article, it's pretty critical of the game, calling it incoherent, stupid, and boring. If you're really trying to get this game published, you might not want this page around. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• I said some people THINK the game is incoherent. oh and this isn't to promot it, I said that it could be used for people who want to play it. That is not the entire purpose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:St. Brian (talk • contribs)
• Again, that's really not what Wikipedia's for, read WP:NOT. But again, the main thing here is notability (WP:NOTE) and verifiability (WP:V), neither of which have been addressed yet. Please sign your posts. Natalie 21:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - First thing I look for is references in an article. I do not see any references. Def a delete. Chris Kreider 21:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - No notability at all. There is no way to know if even more than one person knows about this game. It is also an obvious vanity page, as the article says it was created by "Brian Harris" and the username of the creator, sole contributor, and defender is "St. Brian". -- Renesis (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: per nom, article is unsourced, not notable and self promoting.—Asatruer 18:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ASAP: Truly a crime against the grand justice of the Wiki-Elders.-Kinghy 8:11, 31 October 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.