Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Skuchas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ted Skuchas

Ted Skuchas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

lacks sufficient notability as a non-professional role player. NCAA players who are non-professionals should at least have received accolades (be All-Conference, a statistical leader, etc.). If a Ted Skuchas gets a page than anyone who has ever played NCAA Div. 1 ball would be entitled to one, and that would be a LOT of pages Mayumashu (talk) 01:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per WP:BIO; athlete has not reached a fully professional level, and is not competing in the highest amateur ranks. LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails the atlete criteria listed under WP:BIO - Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO (not the primary subject of any secondary sources). He averages 3 points a game. I mean...I'm a Vandy fan, Ted is a popular player...but seriously...although I would question LonelyBeacon's assertion that playing for a top 20 team is not the highest amateur rank...Nevertheless...Ted hasn't been the subject of any sources that I have found and therefore does not meet WP:BIO for amateur athletes. --Smashville^BONK! 15:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree, NCAA Div. 1 is the top amateur league for sport, (for age-group,) isn t it. it s his poor stats, lack of accolades that is the problem. (WP:BIO for sportspeople needs to go farther and stat something about this, tough but not impossible to do) Mayumashu (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.