Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technoport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Technoport

Technoport (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

De-prodded by only editor. Does not appear notable, and no sources. — Coren ^(talk) 08:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Note: article previously speedied as spam. [1] — Coren ^(talk) 08:30, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• (Speedy) delete per nom.- Gilliam 08:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - pre above, I have tagged it for a speedy.--Bryson 19:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I have removed the DB tag from this for two reasons:

1. Albeit the same subject, this is not the same article as the one that was speedy-deleted. It has been condensed and rewritten from the deleted version and is somewhat less spammy than the previous version. However, it could still use some work to be more objective.
2. There is a possibility of some notability here. I found about 900 Google hits (admittedly not a lot) from "Technoport Trondheim" and "Technoport Norway".

I have no opinion on this deletion, but I think we should let it run its course through AFD. However, if the authors cannot provide any more sources and indications of notability, it will likely deleted. ●DanMS • Talk 04:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. This is obvious spam. -WarthogDemon 18:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.