Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaser and link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Teaser and link

Teaser and link (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable whatever it is. An idiosyncratic phrase of a particular industry, perhaps, but no assertion as to its use. Could be partly included in wiktionary in the definition of teaser or abstract or something else. Avruch^Talk 22:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BOLLOCKS Doc Strange 22:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, most online hits seem unrelated. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete While I agree that what the article describes is a valid phenomenon, it's pretty much original research and a neologism. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Belongs in Wiktionary as nom suggests, but unreferenced here. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 01:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 09:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.