Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taryn Terrell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to WWE Diva Search, no predjudice against re-creation if notability issue is settled by reliable sources or if she does something notable, like win the contest. ɑʀкʏɑɴ 20:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Taryn Terrell

Taryn Terrell (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Delete - Lack of information, not written well, 2007 WWE Diva Search Contestant should not get an article at this time, the person is not notable Art 281 02:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - No notability really asserted: it'd be one thing if she was a Playboy Playmate or had won some wrestling award, but there's nothing of that kind.--Voxpuppet 03:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete — Apparent COI as well; posted by SPA, Tnterre1. Askari Mark (Talk) 03:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to WWE Diva Search. No prejudice towards recreation if she wins or gets a permanent job with WWE. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep - written well, playboy model (million times), diva finalist. User:AquariusBoy01 25 August 2007 —The preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:19, August 25, 2007 (UTC).
• Comment - The article is not written well it has run-on sentences & fragments. Just because she has been in Playboy a million times that doesn't make her a notable person, diva search contestant shouldn't have their own articles at this time. There isn't anything else we know or have acquired data for Taryn Terrell. Art 281 16:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Possible KEEP - Playboy would certainly qualify as a reliable independent source. If a featured article or other significant mention can be found regarding her or her career, then keep. [COMMENT: A poorly written article is not automatic grounds for deletion. It should be edited and cleaned up by some of our more active Wikipedians... Hint-Hint.] --BaldDee 15:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - With what? That is all the info the user has acquire to make the article. And Playboy doesn't make her a notable person. Art 281 17:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Yes Playboy does make you a notable person, and if you have posed numerous times. User:AquariusBoy01 27 August 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AquariusBoy01 (talk • contribs) 11:06, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - No it doesn't. The diva search contestants shouldn't have their own article's YET. Art 281 16:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.