Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarikh Ahlul Hadith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tarikh Ahlul Hadith

Incomprehensible religious gibberish. Probably meant to be a hadith about some holy man, but would likely fail WP:NOT, WP:NOR etc. even after extensive cleanup. Bonus points go to this article for citing itself as its only source. Sandstein 18:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I'm inclined to suggest delete per WP:V (article cites itself?!). However, some sources do seem to be provided ... but I honestly can't follow what this article is claiming and how these sources seem to apply. Though sources are cited, I can't make heads or tails out of them (or the article) enough to verify anything. This may be a notable topic in Islamic tradition. However the article, as written, requires a massive cleanup. I would not oppose the article being deleted so something new (and more clearly verifiably sourced) could replace it. Ideally someone familiar with the subject would be willing to clean up/wikify this, confirm its sources, and eliminate WP:NPOV (though honestly I'm not sure I understand the article enough to say if it's even NPOV or not -- parts of it seem to skirt the boundary). Otherwise, I'm afraid a delete might be the best option. Scorpiondollprincess 19:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's almost certainly copyvio although I can't find from where. Possibly [1] Dlyons493 Talk 20:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete looks like patent nonsense to me. No context, either. Danny Lilithborne 22:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.